James Lyons, Admiral USN (ret.), has an interesting bit up concerning LCS. Read the whole thing for a solid review of the problems we have had with the LCS program – no shocker to anyone who has been reading what Sid, Byron, myself, and others have been commenting on for the last few years.

What makes his article from 01 FEB worth a spin here though is a possible solution he offers, one that I have liked for a long time because it feeds into my #1 issue with LCS; in war you have to bring your multi-mission capability with you inside the skin of the ship – not a few days away in a CONEX box ashore or floating on a MSC ship somewhere.

Anyway – here is the idea from a guy who I am just qualified enough to open a door for.

What should be done? The current Navy leadership inherited the LCS program. With the budget constraints Navy ship acquisition programs will face, we simply cannot afford to build a class of ships with the limited capabilities of an LCS. We should step back, acknowledge the LCS shortcomings and look at alternatives currently available.

The Norwegian Aegis frigate, which is a derivative of the Spanish F-100 Aegis frigate, is a candidate that should receive careful consideration. It has a speed of 28 knots; is stealthy and is capable in terms of area AAW and ASW with its Aegis combat system, electro-optical director; hull mounted and towed array sonar, two MK82 fire-control radars, and 127MM and 76MM guns. It also has the capability to host organic manned and unmanned air and surface vehicles. The cost for this very capable warship is about $600 million. Its draft is 5 meters, which also compares favorably with the LCS.

Worth a ponder?

« Bringing Politics to Sea…

February 2009 Proceedings is now Online »

Posted by CDRSalamander in Uncategorized
Tags: LCS
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

← Older Comments

• FOD Detector

  So if some of MEB needs to be sacrificed to fly in and marry up with MPS because a LHD or LHA is needed to become the flight deck that the MH-53’s will fly from then that will happen.

  Uh huh. I’ll believe when I see it.

  RE swapping MPs; there’s no hard consensus on that issue. You can’t highline ‘em. My best guess is that we’ll eventually see dedicated mission (ASW, SUW, or MIW) with short deployment (< 21 day) cycles. The MPs will be forward deployed in the usual places.

← Older Comments