<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNI&#8217;s Two-Pronged Response to DOJ Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/</link>
	<description>The Naval Institute’s taken its independent forum to a new level - with you in the middle of it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105908</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105908</guid>
		<description>...yawn. Someone say something? Thought not. Nap time again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;yawn. Someone say something? Thought not. Nap time again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimaRatioReg</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105901</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimaRatioReg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105901</guid>
		<description>&quot;As for the Geneva Convention of 1949, that is not really relevant.&quot;

Well, that is like saying that the First Amendment isn&#039;t relevant in a free speech case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for the Geneva Convention of 1949, that is not really relevant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, that is like saying that the First Amendment isn&#8217;t relevant in a free speech case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade E.B. Misfit</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105898</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade E.B. Misfit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105898</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the double post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the double post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade E.B. Misfit</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105897</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade E.B. Misfit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105897</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And don’t forget to get back under the bridge where trolls belong, Comrade.&lt;/i&gt;
Call me a troll, if you like.  

It doesn&#039;t change the point that the DoJ prosecuted Chuckie Taylor in a Florida court for acts of torture committed against Liberians in Liberia.  We have recognized extraterritorial jurisdiction, you will have little cause to complain if/when such is exercised against members of the Bush Administration.

Yes, I think Bush should be prosecuted under the doctrine of command responsibility.

As for the Geneva Convention of 1949, that is not really relevant. Does anyone not doubt the proposition that torture is illegal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And don’t forget to get back under the bridge where trolls belong, Comrade.</i><br />
Call me a troll, if you like.  </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t change the point that the DoJ prosecuted Chuckie Taylor in a Florida court for acts of torture committed against Liberians in Liberia.  We have recognized extraterritorial jurisdiction, you will have little cause to complain if/when such is exercised against members of the Bush Administration.</p>
<p>Yes, I think Bush should be prosecuted under the doctrine of command responsibility.</p>
<p>As for the Geneva Convention of 1949, that is not really relevant. Does anyone not doubt the proposition that torture is illegal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade E.B. Misfit</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105896</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade E.B. Misfit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105896</guid>
		<description>And don’t forget to get back under the bridge where trolls belong, Comrade.
Call me a troll, if you like.  

It doesn&#039;t change the point that the DoJ prosecuted Chuckie Taylor in a Florida court for acts of torture committed against Liberians in Liberia.  We have recognized extraterritorial jurisdiction, you will have little cause to complain if/when such is exercised against members of the Bush Administration.

Yes, I think Bush should be prosecuted under the doctrine of command responsibility.

As for the Geneva Convention of 1949, that is not really relevant. Does anyone not doubt the proposition that torture is illegal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And don’t forget to get back under the bridge where trolls belong, Comrade.<br />
Call me a troll, if you like.  </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t change the point that the DoJ prosecuted Chuckie Taylor in a Florida court for acts of torture committed against Liberians in Liberia.  We have recognized extraterritorial jurisdiction, you will have little cause to complain if/when such is exercised against members of the Bush Administration.</p>
<p>Yes, I think Bush should be prosecuted under the doctrine of command responsibility.</p>
<p>As for the Geneva Convention of 1949, that is not really relevant. Does anyone not doubt the proposition that torture is illegal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fouled Anchor</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105852</link>
		<dc:creator>Fouled Anchor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105852</guid>
		<description>Sorry Byron...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Byron&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105846</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105846</guid>
		<description>Damn, Chief, you just had to get me to go look at that place? I gotta rinse my eyes out with gasoline now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, Chief, you just had to get me to go look at that place? I gotta rinse my eyes out with gasoline now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105845</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105845</guid>
		<description>Comrade, how about PROVING they didn&#039;t? Unless you&#039;re all hot gas and bad smells hiding behind a false nick? Mostly, I think you&#039;re a troll who needs to put down the porn and take a bath. And don&#039;t forget to get back under the bridge where trolls belong, Comrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrade, how about PROVING they didn&#8217;t? Unless you&#8217;re all hot gas and bad smells hiding behind a false nick? Mostly, I think you&#8217;re a troll who needs to put down the porn and take a bath. And don&#8217;t forget to get back under the bridge where trolls belong, Comrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimaRatioReg</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105843</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimaRatioReg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105843</guid>
		<description>Gee, what a shock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, what a shock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fouled Anchor</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/04/17/dnis-two-pronged-response-to-doj-release/comment-page-1/#comment-105840</link>
		<dc:creator>Fouled Anchor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=2329#comment-105840</guid>
		<description>I guess that sentiment goes along well with your Let&#039;s Prosecute Bush as a War Criminal statement on your home blog, right, Comrade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that sentiment goes along well with your Let&#8217;s Prosecute Bush as a War Criminal statement on your home blog, right, Comrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

