I’d like to thank Vice Admiral Harvey again for giving me 45 minutes of his time! It was a tremendous opportunity and it will always be something I remember.
What qualities do you value most in junior officers?Â
Looking back on itâŚIâm thinking of the David R. Ray or Cape St. George… (I was a CO of a destroyer and cruiser); I think I really looked for number one: integrity, which goes without question. If youâre my JOD or Engineering Officer of the Watch, CIC watch officer, or helicopter control officer and you report something to me and I donât feel that I can rely upon what you told me because I question your integrity, then the system falls apart. A ship is held together by trust. The bonds of trust are very, very powerfulâthey form the basis for everything else that happens. First, last, and always is people have to believe you and you have believe in themâŚThey donât necessarily have to like youâŚbut they gotta believe that they can trust you when you look them in the eye and say, âThis is it. This is what I need. This is what I have to do.â They gotta believe that itâs trueâor at least you think itâs true. Integrity is the foundation for everything else.
After that, I think I really appreciate a belnd of loyalty and persistence. What becomes very, very valuable to me is someone who I know, I know, I can depend on without checking up on them. They donât have to be brilliant. Itâs great to be really smartâitâs better to be smart than dumb, that goes without saying. Thereâs always going to be someone out there who is smarter than you are and have skillsets you donât haveâŚYou can be the absolutely most persistent, dedicated, stay-to-it officerâthe kind of person who will get it doneâŚI really, really enjoy being with those types of officers who will just go after that job or whatever the task may be, however difficult it may beââtill itâs done or theyâre dead, one or the two.Â
I donât exaggerate. That level stick-to-itness coupled with loyalty (intelligent loyalty, not blind loyalty)âŚThose are the kind of things I really look forâtheyâre the kind of things that make ships good and keep them good.Â
When you were Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Manpower and Personnel, your office released a document about language skills, regional expertise, and cultural awareness. Another article recently in the Naval War College Review [found here] suggested a three-tiered track for officers. How will my generation of officers look different than previous generations?
Yeah, I think thatâs fascinating. As Chief of Naval Personnel, I had the benefit of being able to take a look at the Navy as a wholeâŚand reflected on how weâve organized that [human] talent in the pastâvarious warfare communities, various enlisted ratings and specialties. Really, weâre focused on the world that doesnât exist anymore: the Cold War world with a far more predictable set of circumstances and well-defined roles for everybody in the Navy, whether you were officer or enlisted, warrants or LDO. They were set to deliver a very large, blue-water Navy focused on a war at sea, whether it was in the air, on the surface, or underneath and what it took to support that. So now we fast forward to where we are and we see many, many roles and missions we are expected to carryout, ranging from high-end bluewater conflict to the stuff weâre doing today: riverine squadrons in Iraq, suppression of piracy in Somalia, supporting the Comfort on a swing down SouthâŚThe scope of activity has exploded on us, yet we still have the same structure to bin our talent as we have had for the last 30-40 years.Â
So, I think, in my little view of the crystal ball, the Naval War College Review articleâŚ[is] a pretty good sign of what our future may beâŚYou will see fundamental changes in the construct of the officer corps that gives us a lot more flexibility to put the talent where we need it, when we need it and then make sure those folks are really optimized.Â
The Navy is a classic battle of jack-of-all-trades versus deep expertise in a particular field. At various times and places, you got to have those deep experts and other times you need people who know a lot about a bunch of things and are able to swing from one particular skillset and field to another, depending on what the situation demands. I see a real unlocking of the career paths and restructuring to open it up to give our talent a chance to get more focused on the wider range of areas; weâll see how that takes us.
Itâs going to be a heck of a challenge, obviously. The structure of the officer corps has deep roots and to change those things take an awful lot of guided effort. You donât do it lightly at all, youâve got to give this very, very careful thoughtâŚWith that said, we have to make some fundamental changes and you all will be in the midst of it.
The Navy and the Naval Academy value diversity and while we emphasize cultural diversity, how important is to maintain a force with a diverse economic background? How can the Navy reach out to underrepresented groups?
I think itâs very important to talk about diversityâŚPeople automatically assume it goes to some magic percentage of racial, ethnic, or religious backgroundâŚThe most important thing that people bring to the Navy is their talent, their God-given skills and abilities. We need access to the talent of the nation no matter where that talent is: Southwest, Pacific Northwest, upper-east coast, the heartland, south Floridaâdoesnât matter. We need access to the best young men and women this country has to offer and to come in and do the kind of things the Navy needs to get done. For us, access to that talent and then retaining that talent once we bring it in to the Navy and showing those young men and women that, âHey, youâve got a future with us and will only be limited by what you bring and not because of any artificial barriers in our organization.âÂ
We need to find that talent, we need to be able to recruit them to come in, then go and retain themâŚSo when we talk about this diversity thing, we got to look at this and [realize] that this country is in the midst of one the most significant demographic change in its historyâŚthe majority will become the minority by 2038 (or 2042); that figure will probably be accelerated because demographics are changing faster than expected. Perhaps we need to ensure that we have access to that talent and diverse populationsâŚBecause you want a young man or woman to look up to an organization and say, âI can succeed here because there are people like me in this organization.â I think that’s so important. We need to be that kind of place where anybody looks at us and says, âI can go there. It’s important, it’s something bigger than me. I can make a contribution, I can serve my country, and I can serve myself and achieve my own goals as well.â If you view this from a big aperture, a big scope, you can see that is not about some kind of affirmative action…this is all about barrier removal within our organization and then reaching out and making sure everyone out there knows…we’re the ones you want to serve with…That’s what we’re trying to get at through going out there and putting the Navy all over this country in places where traditionally we didn’t go. That’s where the talent is.
I wonder if there are still barriers that need to be removed and what do they look like, sir?
An eternal truth that gets relearned in every generation is that as long as you have an organization populated by human beings then there will be issues. That’s just as fact of our life…You’re always going to have issues of some kind when you deal with human beings; it’s part of the territory. Recognize it, understand that, and deal with it. Yes, we have issues, they come, they go, they change and I think…we’re making some very positive steps. These steps are being recognized inside the Navy as well as outside the Navy…Also recognize we have places that we have a way to go…We’ll keep at it. We’re very committed to this from the CNO down in terms of achieving our goals and making sure young men and women know that this is the place to be.
- March 9 Midrats Episode 218: Abolishing of the USAF, with Robert M. Farley
- DEF[x] Annapolis: Encourage the Innovators
- A History of the Navy in 100 Objects #48: Models of HMS St. George (1701) and USS Missouri (1944)
- Engineering and the Humanities: The View from Patnaâs Bridge…
- A History of the Navy in 100 Objects #47: British Dockyard Models