<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Our Archive: I Went Joint (But I Didn&#8217;t Inhale) by Lieutenant Commander Lawrence Di Rita, USNR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/01/from-our-archive-i-went-joint-but-i-didnt-inhale-by-lieutenant-commander-lawrence-di-rita-usnr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/01/from-our-archive-i-went-joint-but-i-didnt-inhale-by-lieutenant-commander-lawrence-di-rita-usnr/</link>
	<description>The Naval Institute’s taken its independent forum to a new level - with you in the middle of it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petit voyage en violet &#171; Nihil novi sub sole</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/01/from-our-archive-i-went-joint-but-i-didnt-inhale-by-lieutenant-commander-lawrence-di-rita-usnr/comment-page-1/#comment-122556</link>
		<dc:creator>Petit voyage en violet &#171; Nihil novi sub sole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3513#comment-122556</guid>
		<description>[...] un article publié  en 1993 dans Proceedings mais aujour&#8217;dhui publié sur US Naval Institute blog, un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] un article publié  en 1993 dans Proceedings mais aujour&#8217;dhui publié sur US Naval Institute blog, un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDR Lumpy</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/01/from-our-archive-i-went-joint-but-i-didnt-inhale-by-lieutenant-commander-lawrence-di-rita-usnr/comment-page-1/#comment-120469</link>
		<dc:creator>CDR Lumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3513#comment-120469</guid>
		<description>In a memo written in 1947 from CDR Jimmy Thatch to Adm Reeves while at the Naval Air Training Command, he passionately wrote his reasons for the Navy to not enjoin with the newly created Air Force into joint primary training. 

And, after seeing the IG report in the Navy Times about how the Air Force will not participate in Joint Naval Flight Officer training after their BRAC move to Pensacola, without any consequences to that service. 

Well, maybe CDR Thatch was wise beyond his years. 

So, on that note I will have to disagree that the Navy is not the most parachoial of all the services, as in my experience in joint-multiservice training and my time in a joint command, the Navy tends to be too gracious and accomodating.  

Specifically:

1. After how many years of doing IA/GSAs for the Army and there still is no MOU between the services on the use of our sailors in these billets by NAVCENT. Allowing the Army to use these sailors not as they were intended. We are too accomodating. 

2. The Navy trains over 90% of the USAF C-130 pilots annually, yet we can&#039;t get a steady allotment of Advanced Instrument School quotas from the Air Force in return. Again, too accomodating.

3. NFO training as noted above. 

With the few examples noted above (I could go on), it appears because of our gung-ho and team mentality we are being taken advantage by our sister services. 

Maybe we should follow the Marine Corps Model of Jointness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a memo written in 1947 from CDR Jimmy Thatch to Adm Reeves while at the Naval Air Training Command, he passionately wrote his reasons for the Navy to not enjoin with the newly created Air Force into joint primary training. </p>
<p>And, after seeing the IG report in the Navy Times about how the Air Force will not participate in Joint Naval Flight Officer training after their BRAC move to Pensacola, without any consequences to that service. </p>
<p>Well, maybe CDR Thatch was wise beyond his years. </p>
<p>So, on that note I will have to disagree that the Navy is not the most parachoial of all the services, as in my experience in joint-multiservice training and my time in a joint command, the Navy tends to be too gracious and accomodating.  </p>
<p>Specifically:</p>
<p>1. After how many years of doing IA/GSAs for the Army and there still is no MOU between the services on the use of our sailors in these billets by NAVCENT. Allowing the Army to use these sailors not as they were intended. We are too accomodating. </p>
<p>2. The Navy trains over 90% of the USAF C-130 pilots annually, yet we can&#8217;t get a steady allotment of Advanced Instrument School quotas from the Air Force in return. Again, too accomodating.</p>
<p>3. NFO training as noted above. </p>
<p>With the few examples noted above (I could go on), it appears because of our gung-ho and team mentality we are being taken advantage by our sister services. </p>
<p>Maybe we should follow the Marine Corps Model of Jointness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Our Archive: I Went Joint (But I Didn’t Inhale) by Lieutenant Commander Lawrence Di Rita, USNR</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/01/from-our-archive-i-went-joint-but-i-didnt-inhale-by-lieutenant-commander-lawrence-di-rita-usnr/comment-page-1/#comment-119908</link>
		<dc:creator>From Our Archive: I Went Joint (But I Didn’t Inhale) by Lieutenant Commander Lawrence Di Rita, USNR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3513#comment-119908</guid>
		<description>[...] by a passel of retired captains, colonels, and other certifiable Big Thinkers, imposed on a relu click for more              var _wh = ((document.location.protocol==&#039;https:&#039;) ? &quot;https://sec1.woopra.com&quot; : [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by a passel of retired captains, colonels, and other certifiable Big Thinkers, imposed on a relu click for more              var _wh = ((document.location.protocol==&#8217;https:&#8217;) ? &#8220;https://sec1.woopra.com&#8221; : [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

