<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bulava SLBM Fails&#8230;Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/</link>
	<description>The Naval Institute’s taken its independent forum to a new level - with you in the middle of it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is America About to Be Overrun by the Chinese/Russians/Anybody? &#124; Think Tank West</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-195207</link>
		<dc:creator>Is America About to Be Overrun by the Chinese/Russians/Anybody? &#124; Think Tank West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-195207</guid>
		<description>[...] emerged that could help lower our pulse a little.  The folks over at the U.S. Naval Institute blog point to the sixth failure of the latest Russian SLBM technology, snarkily observing that &#8220;generally speaking, the preferred direction for a ballistic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] emerged that could help lower our pulse a little.  The folks over at the U.S. Naval Institute blog point to the sixth failure of the latest Russian SLBM technology, snarkily observing that &ldquo;generally speaking, the preferred direction for a ballistic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen russell</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131320</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131320</guid>
		<description>Good ol Russia Tech gone awry, save thier vodka production.
No threat here?
Overworked Cold War sub tech since 1990s?
Or is this a ruse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ol Russia Tech gone awry, save thier vodka production.<br />
No threat here?<br />
Overworked Cold War sub tech since 1990s?<br />
Or is this a ruse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Walthrop</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131317</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Walthrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131317</guid>
		<description>Jim,

Too soon.  Like their philosophy or not, sailors probably unnecessarily perished with the Kursk because of Russian reluctance to request assistance.  Fortunately the same mistake was not made during the entanglement of the Priz (AS-28).  BZ to the UK Remora Submarine rescue professionals.  BZ to the Russians for sending up a red star cluster.

V/R,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>Too soon.  Like their philosophy or not, sailors probably unnecessarily perished with the Kursk because of Russian reluctance to request assistance.  Fortunately the same mistake was not made during the entanglement of the Priz (AS-28).  BZ to the UK Remora Submarine rescue professionals.  BZ to the Russians for sending up a red star cluster.</p>
<p>V/R,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131267</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131267</guid>
		<description>Still not as good as they day they sank their own sub.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_submarine_Kursk_explosion

(too soon?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still not as good as they day they sank their own sub.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_submarine_Kursk_explosion" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_submarine_Kursk_explosion</a></p>
<p>(too soon?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagpotter</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131264</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagpotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131264</guid>
		<description>It is a Nanuchka and it looks like a SS-N-9.  Of course those are the NATO names and God knows what the Russians call them now.  It is not a SLBM launch, but a SSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a Nanuchka and it looks like a SS-N-9.  Of course those are the NATO names and God knows what the Russians call them now.  It is not a SLBM launch, but a SSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteelJaw</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131242</link>
		<dc:creator>SteelJaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131242</guid>
		<description>Blowing up (hmm, poor choice of words considering the subject - maybe &lt;i&gt;expanding&lt;/i&gt;?)the picture, I&#039;m thinking maybe a Ropucha LST? If so, and unless there was then some special rig for a test launch (not entirely implausible as SLBMs have been tested from specially fitted barges in the past) me thinks maybe the subject picture provided by Ria Novosti was wrong (wouldn&#039;t be the first either).  OTOH, it *was* a first stage failure and fairly soon after launch...
- SJS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blowing up (hmm, poor choice of words considering the subject &#8211; maybe <i>expanding</i>?)the picture, I&#8217;m thinking maybe a Ropucha LST? If so, and unless there was then some special rig for a test launch (not entirely implausible as SLBMs have been tested from specially fitted barges in the past) me thinks maybe the subject picture provided by Ria Novosti was wrong (wouldn&#8217;t be the first either).  OTOH, it *was* a first stage failure and fairly soon after launch&#8230;<br />
- SJS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131229</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131229</guid>
		<description>What kind of ship is in the pic? I thought it might be an Osa, but the superstructure looks too substantial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of ship is in the pic? I thought it might be an Osa, but the superstructure looks too substantial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dolbow</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dolbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131227</guid>
		<description>thanks for sharing the good news SJS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing the good news SJS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimaRatioReg</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131159</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimaRatioReg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131159</guid>
		<description>One thing about the Rooskies, though.  They&#039;re persistent.  They will get this thing to work if they have to kill all the pro-Western ethnic minorities to do it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing about the Rooskies, though.  They&#8217;re persistent.  They will get this thing to work if they have to kill all the pro-Western ethnic minorities to do it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDR Salamander</title>
		<link>http://blog.usni.org/2009/07/29/bulava-slbm-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-131081</link>
		<dc:creator>CDR Salamander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usni.org/?p=3865#comment-131081</guid>
		<description>Maybe we could send Prime Minister Putin a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bulova.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bulova&lt;/a&gt; with a note saying, &quot;Just change a vowel and it will work.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we could send Prime Minister Putin a <a href="http://www.bulova.com/" rel="nofollow">Bulova</a> with a note saying, &#8220;Just change a vowel and it will work.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->