Torpedo Boats

1101. The motor torpedo boat is a relatively small craft with great speed and striking power essentially offensive in character. Weapons consist of torpedoes, machine guns and usually depth charges. Its main defensive power lies in its small size, speed, maneuverability, ability to lay smoke and cruise silently at slow speeds.

1102. The primary mission of motor torpedo boats is to attack enemy surface ships. Their high speed, and torpedo armaments make them most suitable for surprise attacks against enemy vessels on the surface, at night or during low visibility. –From Motor Torpedo Boats, Tactical Orders and Doctrine, July 1942

December 9, 1942: Off the coast of Guadalcanal the Japanese submarine I-3 slinks toward the shore, attempting to land supplies for the Japanese troops trying to wrest control of the island and its important air field from American Marines and soldiers. A couple of U.S. Navy torpedo boats are patrolling the littorals and are on watch for just such a resupply effort. They spot a Japanese cargo barge and then – the submarine itself. Speeding in on the attack, PT-59 fires two torpedoes, one of which hits the surfaced submarine and detonates, setting off secondary explosions and sinking this part of Japanese logistics effort.

Since the Allies went on the offensive in the Pacific by landing on Guadalcanal, on other nights, larger ships of the Allied fleet have slugged it out with the Japanese fleet that was trying to obliterate the fragile American toehold at Henderson Field. The battles take place at night because with Henderson and other fields, the Allies have daylight air supremacy. Daytime belongs to the Allies. At night, the Japanese rule the seas, being more practiced at night operations and having a vastly superior torpedo. For months sea battles are fought, cruiser and destroyers come to litter the bottom the waters off Savo Island – waters that come to be known as “Iron Bottom Sound” for the number of disemboweled ships resting on the sea floor.

Fighting through the Allied response, the Japanese land thousands of troops to push the Americans off Guadalcanal. Still, the Americans hold, enduring rigors of war possibly not seen since the American Civil War -disease, malnutrition, a fierce enemy and the “Tokyo Express” roaring down Bougainville Strait bringing supplies for troops and heavy guns to blast Henderson Airfield.

It’s all about the airfields, all about having fixed bases to fly aircraft to attack the next island, to oppose enemy airplanes, to cover the “hop” to the next island and another airfield.

The U.S. Navy is fighting on a shoe string, paying the price for not being prepared for war. The Japanese fleet has proved superior at night fighting and has better torpedoes. Running out of big ships in late 1942, the U.S. Navy tries an experiment – it brings into battle a small group of wooden- hulled, high speed torpedo boats. These Torpedo Patrol Boats (PT) boats offer a high level of firepower for their weight. They also have serious disadvantages. Unlike larger ships, the PT boats cannot operate for weeks at sea – they need support bases and shore based shops for engine maintenance and hull repair. As Captain Robert J. Bulkley, Jr. set out in At Close Quarters: PT Boats in the United States Navy wrote:

“They were not designed to patrol hundreds of miles to sea, but to deliver sudden punches close to shore and relatively near their bases.”

The experiment went forward.

Four PT boats were shipped and towed near the Solomons. They then headed for the island of Tulagi (taken from the Japanese at the same time as Guadalcanal) where they will be based arriving October 12, 1942. Another four boats arrive on October 25.

There are now eight American PT boats in the Solomons. None of them and not many of their crews has ever been in combat. For the next four months they all will see plenty of it.

A Very Little History

It was the Russians who first used “torpedo launches” when fighting the Ottoman Empire in 1877 in waters near the coast – the littorals. They used fast boats firing self-propelled torpedoes to sink a ship. Soon small, fast, cheap torpedo boats became all the naval rage – especially for “lesser” powers who sought to counteract massive battleships without having to cash in the royal jewels to pay for them.

The idea was simple: Release a swarm of torpedo boats which in turn release a swarm of torpedoes and you might just sink that cruiser or battleship – with minimal risk of losing your entire fleet. High speed and maneuverability would protect the torpedo boats from the big slow battleships and cruisers of the day.

Not that these new weapons weren’t met by counter-weapons. You may recall that the modern “destroyer” began life as the “torpedo boat destroyer,” designed to protect major ships from gnat sized boats with a big bite.

The U.S. Navy toyed with torpedo boats during World War I, but, safely protected by vast oceans, let the torpedo boat concept lie fallow until shortly before World War II. After an exceptionally short period of testing, boats were ordered. The first modern American PT boats were built by Elco, Higgins and Huckins.

The Elco boats were 77 feet long, powered by three V-12 Packard aircraft engines. In theory these boats could hit 50 knots and yet had a draft of only 5 feet, making them ideal for inshore operations. They carried up to four torpedoes and an assortment of automatic weapons.

It was the torpedoes and the speed that mattered most. The torpedoes could, if working properly, sink or severely damage large ships. The speed could allow the boats to escape harm by racing in for attack and back out.

Speed had a disadvantage. The boats did have a rather large wake. As the book Motor Torpedo Boats, Tactical Orders and Doctrine notes:

1202. The wakes of motor torpedo boats at high speeds are visible considerable distances, both from the air and surface. The wake of center engine is less visible than that of wing engines. These factors should always be considered when planning operations unless satisfactory wake camouflaging apparatus is installed.

In the Solomons

1204. Employed in tactical units of relatively large numerical strength, the motor torpedo boat squadron becomes a powerful offensive weapon.

Remember the concept of PT boats – swarm attacks at high speed:

These early PT boats have no radar. They must see their target before they can engage it. And they must hope that they see their target before their target sees them.

Moonless nights or nights in which visibility is hampered by rain, like those favored by the “Tokyo Express” are tough on PT boat crews. To try to get ahead of the Japanese, the PT boats post pickets on either side of Savo Island, hoping that a boat will spot the Express as it rumbles by and that a radio signal will tell the other boats which direction to head.

The boat crews know when to go out because coast watchers on islands up the Solomon chain report in. “Ten destroyers inbound” “Two cruisers and 4 destroyers coming through Bougainville Straits.”

The coast watchers are far enough away that the Japanese run by them in daylight. Daylight also means that Allied aircraft can go ship hunting – and the follow up to coast watcher reporting is often attacks by B-17s, B-24s and dozens of fighters. The Japanese pay a price in their efforts to reinforce and resupply Guadalcanal.

At the end of that chain of forces attacking the Japanese navy in October 1942 are eight PT boats. The boats are skippered and operated by young men. Men who understand that speed means life. Night after night they go out, ragged, sick. Boats are cobbled together to keep them running. The main fleet has taken a pounding – Iron Bottom Bay speaks of it. Now, often the night belongs to the gnats.Rarely are all eight ready. They go out in pairs. They lurk in the shadows waiting.

The PT skippers dodge shell fire, coral reefs and work their way into firing positions. Throttles on full, the boats begin their runs – closing to inside 500 yards, torpedoes unleashed. Explosions, but -too often it seems – there is something wrong with the American torpedoes. What appear to the boat crews as certain hits turn out to be premature explosions . . . but the crews fight on. Night after night.

Every now and then, a definite success, as with the submarine I-3 or, a couple of days later the destroyer Terutsuki hit by a PT torpedo and sunk. Terutsuki was part of a twenty destroyer force. At least part of that group sprang a trap on the PT boats. December 11 marked another PT boat sunk by enemy action.

The point is not that the PT boats did or didn’t take out battleships or cruisers. They were not operated as attack squadrons with the ability to swarm a target from several directions. They operated in pairs, maintaining as stealthy posture as possible until they could attack. They were not guided or directed by radar during this time – finding the enemy was based on “feel” and luck. What cannot be doubted is the bravery of the crews and that they applied every ounce of skill they had to try to stop the enemy.

This tiny force saved lives among the Marines and soldiers on Guadalcanal as they unhesitatingly threw themselves against bigger ships with bigger guns.

In time, the combination of air superiority and improved Allied naval tactics caused the Japanese to alter their plans of resupply. At first they attempted to float supplies ashore in drums pulled by barges. The PT boats helped break up that effort. When the Japanese began just tossing drums full of supplies into the waters near Guadalcanal in hopes that they might drift ashore, the PT boats cruised the inshore areas, blasting all the drums they came across.

As the American war effort picked up, things got better for the PT boats:

About the first of December the PT’s received welcome assistance from half a dozen SOC’s–Navy scout observation planes. The SOC’s had been carried aboard cruisers damaged in the many actions around Guadalcanal, and were left behind with orders to work with the PT’s when their cruisers left the area for repairs. Every night the PT’s expected action; one or two SOC’s flew up the Slot to spot enemy ships and report their position. It was a hazardous assignment for the SOC’s, because the Japanese ships usually made their runs under cover of bad weather, and several were lost.

Further assistance was received about the first of January, with the arrival of a squadron of PBY’s, Navy patrol bombers known as “Catalinas” or “Black Cats.” The PBY’s not only reported positions but heckled enemy ships by dropping flares and bombs, sometimes forcing the ships to reveal their positions by drawing fire from them. Once, toward the end of January, when a group of PT’s was waiting near Savo to engage an approaching force of 12 enemy destroyers, the Black Cats bombed the destroyers so effectively that they turned and fled before they had come within 30 miles of Guadalcanal. (Bulkley, p 93)

Finally, surprisingly quickly, the Japanese withdrew their forces from Guadalcanal. The Americans and their allies had won a major offensive. But the battle of the Solomons continued as the Japanese built new air bases on other islands. And the PT boats went after them there, too.

In the summer of 1943, the PT boats were back in the interdiction business – attempting to stop the flow of men and supplies by Japanese barges to the new airfields. As the war moved up the Solomons, the PT boats moved too. PT boats moved to two bases near Rendova and with their new primary mission:

The situation had changed since the first days at Tulagi. Now we had the preponderance of sea power. Our cruisers and destroyers shelled enemy positions on New Georgia and Kolombangara at will, and in the Battle of Kula Gulf on July 5/6, the Battle of Kolombangara on 12/13 July, and the Battle of Vella Gulf, on August 6, in which they sank a total of three destroyers and a light cruiser, convinced the enemy that he would have to place his main reliance on coastal barges rather than the Tokyo Express to transport troops and supplies to his bases on New Georgia, Kolombangara, Arundel, Gizo, and the small neighboring islands. The barges were relatively expendable, and could operate close to shore in waters inaccessible to ships of deeper draft. Vulnerable to aircraft attack by day, they usually passed the daylight hours nestling against the shore, well camouflaged by freshly cut leaves and palm fronds, and made their runs at night, preferably in the dark of the moon. Barges became the Japanese lifeline. For the rest of the Solomons campaign, barge hunting was to be the principal mission of the PT’s. (Bulkley,p116)

Barge hunting became the principal occupation of the PT’s, both at Rendova and at Lever Harbor. From their first contact on July 21 until the end of August, the Rendova boats encountered 56 barges and 5 small auxiliary ships. They claimed 8 barges and 1 auxiliary sunk, 3 barges and 1 auxiliary probably sunk, and 6 barges and 1 auxiliary damaged. The Lever Harbor boats, which had their first barge action on August 3, engaged 43 or 44 barges from then until the end of the month, of which 2 were sunk, 1 was forced to be beached, and 8 to 16 were hit with possible damage.(Bulkley, p.127)

It was from a Rendova base that the future president, John Kennedy, started his ill-fated first combat experience with PT-109.

Don’t discount barges in terms of fighting capability. Too shallow in draft to be attacked with torpedoes, each barge required a PT boat to close to the range of its guns and that also put the PT boats in the range of guns on the barges. Some the barges were armored and posed quite a challenge to the PT “barge busters.”

The Japanese had learned few tricks along the way – that distinctive wake of the PT boats brought nightly attacks by Japanese planes homing in on the wakes. Further,

Japanese countermeasures against PT’s included the mounting of heavier guns–up to 40mm.–on their barges, and installation of shore batteries along the barge routes. Lieutenant Commander Kelly reported late in August, “Heavily armored large barges with 40mm. and machine-guns escort the medium barges which carry only machine-guns and/or 20 mm. In order to sink a barge, the range must be closed well within 100 yards and more than 1,000 rounds of .50 caliber and 500 rounds of 20mm. are required . . . This requires laying to at point blank range of shore batteries and barges for approximately 10 minutes which is tantamount to sacrificing the PT boat.” (Bulkley, p.130)

The U.S. Navy invited Army soldiers to go to sea to fight barges, as set out by Richard H. Wagner, in Barge-Busting With The PT Boats, describing the exploits of his father, George Wagner:

It is not clear who came up with the idea but after fighting in the jungles and swamps of New Georgia … Soldiers were ordered to rendezvous with some PT boats along the coast and to bring their automatic weapons.

The mission was to assist the Navy in fighting the barges that were shuttling troops between New Georgia and the Japanese stronghold on the neighboring island of Kolombangara.

The primary barge used by the Japanese in the Solomons was the Type A Daihatsu. This metal-hulled craft was nearly 50 feet long and weighed about eight tons. It was capable of carrying up to 120 men or 15 tons of cargo. It was no greyhound as it could only do about one knot. However, they traveled by night and hid along the jungle shore during the daytime, making it difficult for them to be spotted by airplanes.

The coxswain and the engine room were armor-protected. In addition, each Daihatsu came equipped with two machine guns. This armament was frequently supplemented in the field by 40mm guns as well as by the firepower of the troops that the barge was carrying. Thus, the barges were formidable opponents for the wooden PT boats…

Some of the PT boats had radar but they also relied upon lookouts for the difficult task of spotting the barges against the dark shorelines. Black Cat night aircraft would also occasionally guide the boats to their targets.

The soldiers took up positions on the PT boats as they proceeded along the coast in the darkness. George set up the BAR on the bow of the boat.

Bullets from the PT boats’ machine guns and lighter caliber weapons could not penetrate the armored sides of the Daihatsus. However, their continuous fire kept the heads of the Japanese gunners and troops down. This enabled the PT boats to maneuver behind the barges where they were more vulnerable.

When a barge was discovered, the night would erupt in a blaze of tracer fire. The Soldiers and the PT boat’s guns firing and the fire returning from the barge. The opponents were at point blank range, separated by some 20 yards – - the Japanese relying on the barge’s protective armor while the PT boat maneuvered for advantage in the shallow water. In a few moments of intense fire it was all over with the barge disabled or sinking.

The war continued to move north toward Japan, with the PT boats also continuing to harass enemy logistics flow, quite successfully, it seems. Captured Japanese reports refer to the challenges presented to barge operations by the PT boats.

Eventually, the war moved out of the Solomons and so did the fighting PT boats.

In retrospect, the PT boats suffered early from a lack of numbers, lack of radar and faulty torpedoes. Whether they could have sunk more ships will never be known. What is known is that their crews were brave men who undertook a challenging task and did it as well as their equipment allowed them to. Whatever failures one can find in the PT operations in the Solomons, it was never because of the crews.

Sources:

Breuer, William, Devil Boats: The PT War Against Japan, Presidio Press, Novato 1995

Bulkley, Robert J, At Close Quarters: PT Boats in the United States Navy, Naval History Division, Washington: 1962 (available online here)

Morison, Samuel E., The Two Ocean War, Little Brown, Boston 1963

Potter, E.B.(editor), Sea Power, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis 1981

Wagner, Richard H. Barge-Busting With The PT Boats (Originally published by the Navy League of the United States, New York Council in The Log, Fall 2007) (Available on line here)

UPDATE: See also PT Boats, Inc..

HNSA “Know your PT Boat”.

HNSA Motor Torpedo Boats, Tactical Orders and Doctrine”




Posted by Mark Tempest in Uncategorized


You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  • CINCLAX

    The PTs received a good deal of notoriety in the post-war, first from a fictionalized book about Bulkely’s exploits in rescuing MacArthur from Corregidor (They Were Expendable, 1942), then later from JFK’s PT-109 saga. Courageous men, to be sure, but was all the effort expended on the plywood wonders worth it?

    As torpedo boats, their results were quite poor, and the largest ship they ever sank was, in fact, an American attack transport. McCawley (ca. 9600 tons) had been Kelly Turner’s amphibious force flagship for nearly a year when she was torpedoed by Japanese aircraft in Blanche Channel off Rendova in July 1943. Dead in the water and awaiting a tow from the tug Pawnee, the “Whacky Mac” took two fish from PTs and sank in minutes.

    At Surigao Strait (October 1944), some 39 PTs attacked Nishimura and Shima’s groups—both on their way in and later on their way out, with most of the survivors now crippled by American gunfire and destroyer torpedoes. Hundreds of PT torpedoes were launched, but only one hit was scored, and that on a ship which had never been directly targeted.

    As night time scouts in the Solomons, their work was increasingly taken over by PBY Black Cats and leftover cruiser floatplanes working out of Tulagi. PBY “Dumbos” did the rescue work most of the time.

    Speed, ostensibly the PTs’ greatest defensive weapon, often proved a liability as their white rooster-tail wakes could be seen for miles at night at speeds above 20 kts.

    Finally, as barge busters, the PT results were disappointing, and close engagements with the steel-hulled and well-armed Japanese Daihatsu landing craft frequently resulted in small arms casualties aboard the PTs. By November 1943 at Cape Torokina (Bougainville) this job was largely taken over by LCI gunboats.

    Much more successful WW II torpedo boats were the German S-Boats (sometimes referred to as “E-Boats”). So respected were they, in fact, that the British kept some after the war. By contrast, the U.S. burned almost all its PTs at war’s end.

  • Chuck Hill

    The same sort of coastal traffic developed in the Mediterranean Theater. There the Germans used “Flak Lighters” which were frequently equipped with 88mm guns. To counter them British motor gun boats (MGBs) and motor torpedo boats (MTBs) worked with American PTs. The PTs had the radar but defective torpedoes and limited guns. The MGBs brought effective guns, and the MTBs had good torpedoes.

    Originally the only guns on the PTs were four .50s in two twin powered mounts very much like you would find on a bomber. The crews improvised. One of the most popular installations was the 37 mm gun taken from crashed P-39 fighter planes.

    To counter barge traffic, as well as provide close in fire support, the US also developed gunboat versions of the LCI with up to 3 twin 40 mm or a 3″/50 and two twin 40s.

  • sid

    Speed, ostensibly the PTs’ greatest defensive weapon, often proved a liability as their white rooster-tail wakes could be seen for miles at night at speeds above 20 kts.

    The barge busting job didn’t require speed. Indeed, it required lots of loiter time. Not to mention the nav difficulties at night. Also, in theater, the fouled bottoms, haphazard maintenance in primitive conditions, and frequent field mods, served to reduce the speed of the boats.

    All lessons studiously ignored in LCS-land.

    No folks. It won’t be different next time. Expect those

  • sid

    Expect those same devils to vex you too.

  • Chuck Hill

    During and immediately after WWI, there were some significant successes by torpedo boats. Italian MAS 15 sank the Austrian dreadnought Szeat Istvan, 11 June 1918. British MTB S88 sank the Soviet dreadnought Petropavlovsk (later raised, subsequently renamed Marat), 17 Aug 1919 and MTB S31 sank the pre-dreadnought Andrej Pervozvannyj, 18 Aug 1919.

  • Chuck Hill

    Coastal traffic also became a concern in Viet Nam, hence Operation Market Time, Coast Guard Squadron One (82 ft WPBs) and Three (WHECs), DERs, and the return of the PTs with the Nasty class (w/o torpedoes).

  • UltimaRatioReg

    One can be sure that our adversaries will have studied the employment of “FLAK lighters” and other such weapons in high-traffic areas, and will be very skilled at concealing those vessels among commercial and fishing traffic.

    Even if those hidden vessels carry SPG-9 or 23mm cannon, or any of the other widely available and very OLD weapon systems I have mentioned ad nauseum in the previous posts, the resultant damage to a design such as LCS would be decisive, even if the enemy vessel was destroyed.

    Show of hands, if you were playing the adversary, who wouldn’t trade a 100′ fishing boat and a dozen jihadists for a mission kill (or worse) on an $450 million LCS and ten or fifteen US casualties? Two boats? Five?

  • Chuck Hill

    Maybe it would be a good idea to revisit the original LCS:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_Craft_Support

    These were ships you could run aground intentionally with minimal damage.

  • CINCLAX

    Chuck…

    Good point about the old LCS. How many of these could be built today for the cost of one $450 million LCS? Maybe a hundred? Give them a few more knots of speed, and there’s your perfect patrol boat against Somali pirates.

  • Scott B.

    This is slightly off-topic, but since we’re on the USNI blog, I am under the impression that this is the right place for asking. Here we go :

    a) one key reference book is absent from the sources listed at the end of Eagle1′s blog entry :

    U.S. Small Combatants, Including Pt-Boats, Subchasers, and the Brown-Water Navy: An Illustrated Design History by Norman Friedman.

    b) this book has been out of print for some time now, and a used copy now costs well over $100, whereas the list price for this book was $67.50.

    This is my question for the good folks of USNI : do you guys have any plans to re-print this book in the near future, e.g. for Christmas ?

    Same question for another out-of-print book by Norman Friedman, U.S. Cruisers: An Illustrated Design History

  • Chuck Hill

    Thought “Cactus Air Force” referred exclusively to planes based out of Guadalcanal, Cactus being their call sign.

  • leesea

    The point which all the analysts are missing is that the PT boats were part of a spectrum of ships brought into service which ended up fighting other threats. The USN of today has NO SUCH spectrum! Many may question their effectiveness NONE can or should deride the bravery of their crews! The PT were relatively simple warboats with few weapons systems and not much by way of sensors. They accomplished a lot in that perspective.

    The lesson should be learned from WW2 PTs is that many small combatants with modern weapons and sensors CAN attack and defeat enemy warships in the Green Waters of the world (and those near a certain large Asian country).

    See also “The Mighty Midgets of War”

    P.S. Glad I already have a copy of Friedman’s book which I reread regularly.

  • Eagle1

    It is my opinion that if the PT boats had begun the war with adequate torpedoes then, even with their other limitations, they could have done more damage to the Japanese fleet.

    Given what they had to work with what they did accomplish in their 4.5 months of service in the Guadalcanal fight was a tribute to American sailors.

  • Spade

    “The point which all the analysts are missing is that the PT boats were part of a spectrum of ships brought into service which ended up fighting other threats. The USN of today has NO SUCH spectrum!”

    +1 to leesea

  • Grandpa Bluewater

    “if the PT boats had begun the war with adequate torpedoes then, even with their other limitations, they could have done more damage to the Japanese fleet”:

    For “PT boats”, substitute “Navy”. For current affairs, further substitute “shipbuildiing and ship design” for torpedoes.

    leesea: “The USN of today has NO SUCH spectrum!”

    It’s only going to get worse. Misplaced priorities. Lack of understanding, lack of communication (sales) skill. We can send a message anywhere, but we can’t explain sea power, why it matters, or what we need to do maintain it or (increasingly) get it back.

    Oddly, all our Navy’s senior leadership has a thick file of perfect fitreps. How can that be?

  • Chuck Hill

    “Oddly, all our Navy’s senior leadership has a thick file of perfect fitreps. How can that be?”

    They have “sales skills,” telling it like it is, not required.

  • Joe Hinds

    America is still without an adequate small boat force. It seems that almost no one in the rarefied air of naval command cannot see a use for small boats even while pirates in the Gulf of Aden and the Malaysian waters pull off several successful attacks each month.

    Our navy is still day dreaming about the comeback of battleships and monster carriers. WE are truly in trouble with these guys at the helm.

  • http://www.jadootvspain.blogspot.com Cricket PLUS LIVE

    recommended this articles to my friend, thanks for sharing for this useful information, Good Job
    The Solomons Campaign: Torpedo Boats and Littoral Warfare | USNI Blog

2014 Information Domination Essay Contest