On June 1st, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Republic of Korea (ROK) Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jinÂ metÂ to discuss the creation of an â€śalternative joint operation bodyâ€¦similar to that of the current South Korea-U.S. Combined Forces Command.â€ť According to the YĹŹnhap News Agency, should this change occur, the ROK Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will lead the new combatant command with the â€śtop U.S. commander in South Korea serving as his deputy.â€ť
Although I haveÂ written previouslyÂ that the United States should retain theÂ wartime OPCON (Operational Control)Â for the sake of flexible strategic responses against the DPRK, it appears unlikely that the joint decision between the United States and the ROK to transfer the OPCONÂ to the ROK military will be reversed. So how can the U.S.-ROK naval forces successfully adapt to the change?
Answering this question necessitates that we first examine the existing ROK naval capabilities. To the extent that the ROK Navyâ€™s (ROKN) capabilities warrant our attention, it can be argued that this is due to theÂ ROKâ€™s recent military build-up. It should also be noted that the ROKâ€™s naval might can beÂ seen as a reflection of its commercial interests abroad. Indeed, Terrence RoehrigÂ aversÂ that the ROKNâ€™s blue-water capabilities, as seen in its commitment to the ongoing counter-piracy campaigns in the Gulf of Aden, might suggest a link between and its naval might and the ROKâ€™s need to protect its commercial interests and its international standing as a middle power. While there may be some truth to his argument, aÂ more plausible explanationÂ might be that naval power still remains â€śthe best possible means of ensuring the regionâ€™s safety without triggering any further escalation.â€ť After all, the ROKNÂ has more than proved its mettle duringÂ limited naval skirmishesÂ in the late 1990s and early 2000s over theÂ contested Northern Limit Line (NLL).Â It is not surprising, therefore, that the ROKN remains the most battle-hardened of the four ROK armed service branches.
Nonetheless, the ROKNÂ still has a long way to go before it establishes itself as a truly independent armed service. As the sinking of the corvette Châ€™ĹŹnan and the shelling of YĹŹnpâ€™yĹŹng in 2010 suggest, the ROKN stillÂ lacks the ability to conduct anti-submarine warfare (ASW)Â and to successfullyÂ counter DPRKâ€™s asymmetric threats. The ROKNâ€™s operational shortcomings are particularly troubling in that they were highlighted by the Korean Peopleâ€™s Army Navy,Â suffering its ownÂ limited operability due to its aging fleet and lack of unity within its command structure.
However, as myÂ January pieceÂ for theÂ Georgetown Journal of International AffairsÂ and Michael Raskaâ€™sEast Asia ForumÂ article argue, the greatest barriers to service excellence for theÂ ROKNÂ may beÂ South Koreaâ€™s uneven defense spending, and operational and institutional handicaps within the conservative ROK officer corps. Because the ROK Armed Forces remains Army-centric, whereby its command structure and logistics fall under the control of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (ROK CJCS), who has always been an Army general,Â the ROKN has yet to achieve autonomy as a truly independent service within the existing arrangement. Such barriers do not bode well for the ROKâ€™s most battle-hardened service branch because it ultimately stymies much-needed flexibility and creativity.
In light of both Kim JĹŹng-Ĺnâ€™s constant threats and the newly proposed Combined Forces Command structure, readjustments at both operational and strategic levels may beÂ required for the U.S.-ROK naval forces to successfully deter further acts of aggression by Kim JĹŹng-Ĺn. One such readjustment, given ROKNâ€™s weaknesses in its ASW capabilities and counter-asymmetric warfare, would be to redirect ROKNâ€™s focus away from itsÂ blue-water ambitionsÂ to bolster its coastal defense capabilities. But doing so would jeopardize ROKâ€™s maritime interests abroad and would foster theÂ unevenÂ growth of ROKN by encouraging uneven emphasis on one naval element at the expense of another.
Instead, a more pragmatic alternative would be for South Korea and the United States, together with Japan, to establish a combined fleet. While it is true that South Korea and JapanÂ remain at oddsÂ over historical grievances and the territorial row over Dokdo/Takeshima, given that the three naviesÂ frequently interact through joint exercises, such as RIMPAC, and other exchange programs, so the creation of such fleet in the face of a common threat should not beÂ ruled out. Under this arrangement, each navy would buttress inter-operabilityÂ by sharing its unique resources and culture with each other. Indeed, the proposed combined fleet would enable ROKN admirals to effectively exercise wartime command over their own fleets, while at the same time help them learn from their sister navies [see note below]. Even more important for the United States,Â given thatÂ â€śthe U.S. operation within the Korean Peninsula is likely to remain a peacekeeping one,â€ť such arrangement would â€śensure that [the United States Navyâ€™s] presence is seen and not necessarily felt.â€ť Last but not least, the proposed combined fleet could serve as a quick reaction force in the event of unforeseen crises.Ultimately, in order for the U.S.-ROK naval forces to effectively counter the threats posed by the DPRK, the ROK Armed Forces itself must undergo a radical transformation. Doing so necessitates that it gradually move away from its Army-centric culture to accommodate jointness among the four services. It must also come up with a coherent budget to sustain its capabilities.
In short, the 2015 wartime OPCONÂ transfer may pose challenges for the U.S.-ROK naval forces to successfully counter and deter future provocations by Kim JĹŹng-Ĺn. Nevertheless, it also presents an opportunity for those who would seize it. Perhaps this evolution in the extant U.S.-ROK alliance may allow the ROKN to truly come of age as an independent fighting service.
Note: In a subsequent blog entry, I will explore ways in which the US-ROK Navies, together with the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF), can best optimize their capabilities within the aforementioned combined fleet structure.
- On Midrats 19 April 2015 – Episode 276: “21st Century Ellis”
- John Quincy Adams — The Grand Strategist: An Interview With Historian Charles N. Edel
- 4 Reasons Not to Resign Your Commission as a Naval Officer
- About Face: A Return to Marine Corps Innovation
- On Midrats 29 March 15 – Episode 273: Partnership, Influence, Presence and the role of the MSC